too hard. It meant that every series, a national league team would be playing an American League team and would have to deal with a DH. So, Mack is at fault because his Designated Hitter idea has bloomed into scheduling problems, but what about this Claiborne fellow? How is it his fault? Do not fear loyal reader(s?), i have the answer to that as well. Claiborne decided he did not need to vote on the National League's adoption of the designated hitter. Claiborne had been an open supporter of the N.L. adopting the position, but forwent voting anyway. From there you can probably assume the result. Not voting is equal to a "no" vote. The National League voted down the DH. Claiborne decided not to vote, and the DH fell. This left the Leagues unbalanced...resulting in the scheduling conflict that continues to this day. So, the DH is to blame (thus Mack and Claiborne). So if the DH was removed or put into the National League or the American League got rid of the DH (haha, good one!), the move could be made and a schedule like that of the NBA could be used. One other solution that is ridiculous would be to add two brand spankin' new teams to the American League, but i digress.In Conclusion: Many baseball fans i talk to say, "Why do they not even up the leagues?" Well my loyal follower(s?) i have brought to you the reasoning for Bud Selig and Baseball's elite keeping the format the way it is. With the designated hitter being the way it is, scheduling inter-league series would become far too complex. It is already hard enough to schedule 162 games effectively, so adding this little problem is not worth it...Sorry Cincinnati, Chicago, Houston, Milwaukee, Pittsburgh, and St. Louis...for now you will still have to beat out more teams than any other team in order to make the playoffs (wild card anyone?)
No comments:
Post a Comment